Today I'm giving a talk at our Second Annual MSU Peace Conference.
My talk is called "Interfaith Dialog: Can we really keep it Peace-ful??"
The essence of my talk is the notion that in order to have a successful conversation on heated topics we have to give up 'being right'.
How do we do that?
Well, the moment that someone expresses an opinion that's different from ours and makes us want to REACT we should stop and check ourselves.
See, we are humans.
Humans enjoy a certain primal satisfaction in thinking we are smarter than the next person.
It's satisfying and kinda fun to point out to someone how stupid they are.
I've been known to use the phrase, "It's ok, you're entitled to your wrong opinion."
Funny.
But a statement like that puts people on the defense.
I'd be defensive if someone said that to me!
The moment we feel righteous
the moment we feel 'better than'
the moment we feel that 'if only they would think like me, the world would be a better place' is the moment we've lost our ability to have a true dialog.
We've made ourselves 'right' or 'better than' and put the other person on the defensive.
Dialog turns into taking-turns-talking and no new understandings take place.
I know.
I've been facilitating interfaith dialogs on this campus for over 6 years.
I've experienced both roles. I've been the righteous one and the defensive one.
I've seen people get pissed off,
offended,
angry,
loud,
vehement,
and I've seen them get so inflamed with righteousness they storm out of the room.
Did a new understanding take place?
Or did we become even more judgmental and defensive?
The moment I get the inclination to think of someone else as
closed-minded
self-righteous
uninformed
unenlightened
ignorant
misguided
or just plain wrong
I imagine how they're feeling about ME at that moment.
Given that we're human, chances are they're thinking the same thing about me.
NOW WHAT?
At that moment I need to GIVE UP on trying to change them and
CHANGE MYSELF.
I could tell you that it's impossible to change someone else, but rhetoricians and salespeople have been doing it for years.
There is such a thing as the art of persuasion.
There ARE ways to change people's minds.
That's what the world of advertising is all about, right?
If you're a master of persuasion then, hey, more power to ya.
But in an interfaith conversation, I feel it is more spiritually ethical to give up the desire to persuade.
After all, isn't ALL spiritual practice about union with the divine?
Becoming ego-less, losing our lives so that we may gain them, involves a self-emptying.
Being 'right' is a way to be attached to our identity over and against other people.
It breeds disconnection rather than connection.
Our need to be right, to cling to our identities, blocks spiritual openness to the divine and each other.
If you're thinking,
"Well, I'M being ego-less and open it's THEM who are uptight and clinging stubbornly to their own points of view!"
then you might want to think about letting go.
Sometimes we'll give lip service to the illuminating value of hearing each others opinions when in truth we just want a soapbox for our own.
We preach rather than inquire.
We defend rather than allow our own assumptions to be questioned.
We're so sure our opinions are right, we take any opportunity we can get to speak our opinions publicly, hoping that other like minded, righteous folks will join our cause.
We hope that we'll be able to find others like us who share our correct opinions so we can band together and change the world by sharing our correct opinions loudly and openly with a chorus of supporters attesting to our correctness.
I know.
I've done it.
I was hell-bent on exposing the wrong opinions of others.
As a matter of fact, I'm not even sure I care about opinions
beliefs
values
ideologies
and mine vs. theirs debates as much as I once did.
Opinions may or may not change.
What I DO care about is
HOW WE TREAT ONE ANOTHER.
Whether we agree or disagree isn't as important to me as
how we act once we've heard each other out.
I used to have it out for religious exclusivists - those folks who think their religion is the only right religion and their way of life is holy while everyone else is bound for hell.
I used to be hell-bent on changing their minds.
I sat at the head of an interfaith round table, with indignant tears in my eyes, and asked, "Do you know how hard it is for me to sit here while you say my friends are going to Hell?"
With tears in HER eyes, she answered,
"Do you know how hard it is for me to sit
here while you misinterpreting Scripture?"
Both of us sat there with sincere tears in our eyes.
Both of us desperate to convince one another of the 'right' point of view.
That moment changed me forever.
Instead of seeing our differences, I immediately saw our common goal.
We both thought we had the right answer.
We both thought we knew best.
We were both committed to convincing the other of our 'right' point of view.
WE HAD SOMETHING IN COMMON!
We were clearly committed to the spiritual development of our students.
Our opinions on how to do that were different.
Our interpretations of Scripture were different.
But our COMMITMENTS were the same.
I felt her frustration.
Her frustration was MY frustration.
I thought she was misinterpreting Scripture.
She thought I was misinterpreting Scripture.
We were both emotionally attached to our points of view.
If I wasn't willing to change MY point of view, why should I expect her to be willing to change hers?
She was me.
I was her.
From that day forth it no longer mattered HOW we were interpreting Scripture.
It only mattered THAT we were interpreting Scripture.
Rather than focus on our differences, we focused on our commonalities:
to act with compassion
to love one another
to relieve suffering
to work for the common good on campus and in the world
to offer students a venue in which they could discuss religious questions and find options for the expression of their faith.
Did we still believe that our options for expressing our faith were the right ones?
Yes.
Of course.
But that's what we had in common.
Rather than waste time and energy trying to compete for 'souls' we sat together in weekly, open dialogs and shared our stories, our opinions, our interpretations, always knowing that we were expressing a point of view that the other could accept, reject or continue to consider.
Did we still have a little apprehension on our hearts when we listened to each other?
Sure.
We are human after all.
But we weren't in each other's presence to fight
or compete
or debate
or win.
We truly learned to listen to one an other.
We learned how to listen for ways to work together rather than
work against one another.
We achieved a kind of dialogical nirvana where people of differing opinions could come together and try to understand where the other was coming from with compassion and as little judgement as our fragile human egos would allow.
Take a breath.
Unclench.
Let people be who they are.
I guess I'll be reading this Blog today at our 2nd Annual Peace Conference.
Namaste.
*Movement for Motivation*
Be like the yogi.
Adapt to different people.
Move your body AND your mind.
click here or click below





















































